Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Congress' Approval Rating Hits an All-Time Low.


If You Scored 9 Out of 100, Would You Still Have Your Job?
The new scorecards for Congress are out from Rasmussen Reports...... and they suck! How bad? Congress' approval rating is a 9 - out of 100, not 10. 52% of all questioned say that Congress is doing a poor job. Thoe numbers are worse than President Bush.
It appears that Americans are finally getting the hint. That Congress is where change occurs, and that Congress cares more about advancing their political careers (72%) than in helping people (14%).
Gee Mike, how do we fix this? Easy. Get rid of your Congressman !!!! Find someone - anyone - else to do the job. I didn't used to support this, but I believe the time for term limits has really come. If you have no shot at being in DC for 50 years, you are more likely to just do your job, then go home. So, go out and vote out every sitting person in Congress right now...
This message brought to you by the Nancy Harrelson Committee for Congress..... Not really !
.

6 comments:

hope to be on the chester pa waterfront soon mg said...

at least jim

Anonymous said...

Nevermind Congress, how about http://www.blackfive.net/main/2008/07/when-doesnt-the.html#comments the MSM that might just have faked soem piccies for Mamhoud Achmidennyjad...

Mike Reino said...

Uh... What?

west_rhino said...

LittleGreenFootballs and others seem to have found Iran's missile launch pics were so photoshopped and have been so busted.


OTOH, Pelosi et al, teh folks that have to take the hit for gas prices... look at the record 90% Dems vote against drilling, including Clinton veto of drilling ANWR and 90% record of voting for drilling and expanding domsetic production by Republicans in House and Senate... if someone doesn't take that to the voters, maybe thy're grads of the "corridor of shame"

Mike Reino said...

If the pics were photoshopped, the market isn't buying it. Oil's back up and then some....

west_rhino said...

Oil's back up and Pelosi's at the helm... 9% approval rating says the voters won't buy the "It's Bush's fault" or "Halliburton, Halliburton, Halliburton" or "It's all about the oil". If it were all about the oil, just how much of a price war, undercutting Saudi and Chavez, would Bush/Cheney engineer?

Mike, which carries longer term profitability, inflating the prices OR moving greater volume and reducing the price? Just how did Sam Walton do it?

Now, does the voting public have any memory to go with the CPU?